Carly Fiorina Won the Kid’s Table GOP Debate, for Whatever That’s Worth

Though the Fox News moderators kept lobbing softball questions at Rick Perry all afternoon—and though Perry did a decent job with those questions, not once appearing to forget who he was or where he was—Carly Fiorina clearly won the early kid’s table debate between the bottom seven Republican presidential candidates.

Ladies and gentlemen, your first GOP debate winner.

Ladies and gentlemen, your first GOP debate winner.

To be fair, Fiorina and Perry didn’t have much competition. Rick Santorum, who was one of the better debaters in 2012, seems to have forgotten everything he once knew about winning an audience’s attention. George Pataki and Jim Gilmore were the Retro Twins, talking about 9/11 and the olden days when they were still a part of the national conversation. Bobby Jindal, with his weird tirade about assimilation, was just plain creepy. And Lindsey Graham, with his calls to re-invade Iraq, seemed to be airlifted in from 2005.

The candidates disagreed on a few issues; Pataki is (barely) pro-life, Graham seemed to be pro-Social Security. There were a few minor squabbles about wiretapping—though most were in favor if it—and litmus tests for SCOTUS candidates.

One thing they were all in lock step on was the economy. They all positioned themselves as pro-growth, pro-prosperity candidates. They talked a good game. Santorum even said he was the only one on stage who cared about the American worker. But the problem is, once they started talking about the way they would go about achieving prosperity, they had absolutely nothing new to offer.

+ Read More

Daily Clips: August 6th, 2015

Happy Debate Day!

Nick Hanauer talks Earned Income Tax Credit and Minimum Wage: Our Supreme Troublemaker spoke with The Week and had some very interesting things to say about income inequality and wages. As usual, he hits the nail on the head:

“Our economy is a service economy,” and you can’t really outsource services. Companies that have based their business models on paying low wages “will either need to change or they will go bankrupt. But the beautiful thing about capitalism is someone will find a way to do the same thing as well or better while paying living wages.”

What Nick Hanauer is talking about isn’t some abstract explanation of capitalism. In fact, Skunk Works recently highlighted a real life example of this: Z Pizza had to close in Seattle because of the minimum wage (supposedly), but was swiftly replaced by another pizza place. This is exactly what Hanauer is talking about: “capitalism works super well when companies pay workers a living wage. It’s quite simple and efficient.”

The rise of Bernie Sanders: According to EJ Dionne over at the Washington Post, we are witnessing an interesting twist in the progressive movement. Out of nowhere (well, out of Elizabeth Warren’s shadow) came Vermont’s Bernie Sanders and his honest socialism is striking a chord with American voters. Dionne argues that Bernie Sanders’ surge in national popularity has much to do with his pugnacious ability to tap into America’s “deep frustration with inequality.”

More than that, Sanders (and indeed, Trump) are speaking for those alienated “from the system.” But whereas Trump’s legacy from this election will be “almost entirely about himself”, Bernie’s “candidacy will leave behind policy markers and arguments about the future.”

Secretary of Education skeptical about free college: Arne Duncan isn’t openly hostile to the recent push to make college debt-free, but let’s just say he’s not a supporter. Instead, Duncan and the Obama Administration don’t see student debt as the problem; “it’s when students either don’t graduate or don’t get good jobs, which can turn student debt from a financial handicap into a disaster.” Their perspective is incremental and ameliorative (and understandable), but fairly uninspiring.

Republican Debate Bingo: If you want to have some wholesome fun tonight with the debate, check out this cute little website which can highlight the ridiculousness of the GOP’s talking points.

It’s Econ 101!

You know what phrase you never hear in defense of an argument? “It’s Psych 101!” Or, “It’s Sociology 101!” Or, “It’s Music Theory 101!” You know why? These are all introductory courses. Attending these classes in no way confers even a wisp of expertise on the student. Maybe it’s me, but if I’m having surgery, I want a doctor who has completed medical school, an internship, a surgical residency and years of actual experience in my particular procedure, not just some guy who sat through Biology 101.

Yet I cannot count how many times I’ve heard someone defend a trinket of conventional economic wisdom by rolling their eyes and exclaiming, “It’s Econ 101!

Yawn.

Tell me “It’s Econ 486 (Econometrics II)” and you might give me pause, given that I lack the math chops to make heads or tales of advanced econometrics. But Econ 101? Really? That’s your guide? I know our nation’s economic policy sometimes looks like its been designed by beginners, but that’s not exactly something we should strive for.

So please, stop trying to explain to me how markets work based on your cursory understanding of an introductory text that you read (or skimmed) 30 years ago between bong hits and keg-stands.

Netflix Offers Employees Up to One Year of Maternity and Paternity Leave

Would Frank Underwood, the main character of Netflix's series House of Cards, be likely to support maternity leave?

Would Frank Underwood, the main character of Netflix’s series House of Cards, support maternity leave?

Yesterday afternoon, Netflix made this announcement on their blog:

At Netflix, we work hard to foster a “freedom and responsibility” culture that gives our employees context about our business and the freedom to make their own decisions along with the accompanying responsibility. With this in mind, today we’re introducing an unlimited leave policy for new moms and dads that allows them to take off as much time as they want during the first year after a child’s birth or adoption.

And as a consequence, everybody’s talking about maternity leave this morning. Specifically, they’re talking about how disgraceful it is that America is one of two countries in the world—the other being Papua New Guinea—that doesn’t legally protect leave for new mothers.

Conservatives like to argue the idea of paid maternity leave. This is ludicrous. As a society, we’ve always agreed that we need to encourage people to become parents, for obvious reasons. (Extinction is not optimal.) By not providing paid maternity leave, we’re penalizing women who choose to become mothers, rather than encouraging them. The fact is, for the economy to thrive we need as many people as possible to be full, empowered workers and consumers. We can’t exclude women for becoming mothers. That’s bad for everybody.

So congratulations to Netflix for taking a big public step in favor of maternity and paternity leave. By doing so, they’re contributing to the national conversation. The more businesses that lead the way on this issue, the more likely government will be to eventually take action.

Daily Clips: August 5th, 2015

Seattle City Council election results: As the Slog reported this morning, “incumbents did unsurprisingly well last night, except for Jean Godden.” Ksahama Sawant, Jon Grant, Lorena Gonzalez, Debora Juarez and Mike O’Brien are currently in the lead in their respective districts. All in all, the voter turnout was less than satisfactory: only 21 percent of ballot were returned by Tuesday night, according to David Kroman at Crosscut. And it looks like that turnout won’t eclipse 30 percent when all votes are counted – an embarrassing figure for a city which claims to be politically engaged.

Hillary Clinton says the stock market has done better under Democratic presidents: In late July, Clinton asserted that “the evidence is pretty clear that under Democratic presidents…people do better. And not only working people, middle class people. Even the stock market does better when you have a Democratic president in the White House.” PolitiFact decided to check out this statement to see if it was true or not. The good news? It was found to be “Mostly True.” Nonetheless, they also made clear that “a lot of this stems from luck and timing” and that “a president is only one factor in determining stock market performance.”

Thomas Friedman’s question for the Republican Presidential Debate: In his latest column, Thomas Friedman devoted his entire word count to the one question he’d like to ask the presidential aspirants tomorrow night:

As part of a 1982 transportation bill, President Ronald Reagan agreed to boost the then 4-cent-a-gallon gasoline tax to 9 cents, saying, ‘When we first built our highways, we paid for them with a gas tax,’ adding, ‘It was a fair concept then, and it is today.’ Do you believe Reagan was right then, and would you agree to raise the gasoline tax by 5 cents a gallon today so we can pay for our highway bill, which is now stalled in Congress over funding?

Why is this such a key question? Because it cuts to the core of what is undermining the Republican Party today and, indirectly, our country: There is no longer a Republican center-right that would have no problem raising the gas tax for something as fundamental as infrastructure.

He hits the nail right on the head. Today’s GOP simply isn’t willing to offer innovative policy ideas anymore because they approach (almost all) issues from a far-right prism. And that’s not good news for our nation’s prosperity. As Friedman states, this prosperity can only be achieved “if there is a center-right party offering creative, market-based solutions to meet these opportunities and challenges — ready to compromise with a center-left party offering more government-oriented approaches.”

This was supposed to be the GOP’s best field in a decade…And yet, Donald Trump of all people is leading in the race. This surprises Ezra Klein, because “the common explanation for the crazy, carousel-like nature of the [2012 GOP] campaign was that the Republican field was weak.” But that excuse does not apply in this race, so why is this election cycle playing out much like 2012? Could the common denominator be that the GOP is, in fact, hog-tied to a crazy party base? To me, that seems like the only logical explanation for the insanity we continue to see exhibited from the modern day Republican party.

Restaurant Owner Who Said “We are…certainly not opening another business in our beloved Seattle” Due to $15 Minimum Wage Is Opening Another Restaurant in His Beloved Seattle

15Now.org

Welcome to West Seattle, Mioposto! The local Italian restaurant chain is opening its third location in the Admiral District next Saturday—another sign of the Seattle restaurant scene’s increasing strength. Isn’t it hard to believe that just last year, local restaurant owners were complaining that moving toward a $15 minimum wage would kill the restaurant scene dead? Now that we’ve seen our first wage increase and restaurants keep opening, those prophecies of doom seem pretty silly. I bet those owners are feeling kinda dumb right around now.

Hey, wait a minute! Turns out, one of Mioposto’s owners was complaining about the minimum wage increase. Go figure! As Working Washington pointed out, Jeremy Hardy—who also owns Coastal Kitchen—told Eater Seattle last year that he’s “certainly not opening another business in our beloved Seattle” due to the minimum wage increase, and that he “falls somewhere between feeling sad and feeling betrayed that this grenade has been dropped on us.”

Um. Huh. Maybe he was being hyperbolic? Perhaps Hardy knew he was playing Chicken Little on the minimum wage increase, and he was doing it as a rhetorical exercise of some sort? Hm. No, that can’t be it, because he told Puget Sound Business Journal that “this is not one of those Chicken Little moments.” And just before the increase went into effect, Hardy told KCTS that “I am not a cry wolf type of person.”

After all that crying wolf and hollering about the sky falling and bemoaning the fate of his beloved Seattle, Hardy must be one hungry fellow. May we suggest he try the food at the Admiral outlet of Mioposto? Maybe they’ll make a special pizza with crow on it, just for him.

Charles Koch Fancies Himself to Be a Modern-Day Martin Luther King Jr.

The Koches, with MLK's words.

The Koches, with MLK’s words.

Matea Gold at the Washington Post says “Charles Koch on Sunday compared the efforts of his political network to the fight for civil rights and other ‘freedom movements,’ urging his fellow conservative donors to follow the lead of figures such as Frederick Douglass, Susan B. Anthony and Martin Luther King Jr.”

This doesn’t mean that Koch suddenly started caring about racism, sexism, or income inequality. Instead, the billionaire who helped fund some of the most reactionary Republican candidates of the last decade thinks that conservatives should steal from the playbooks of Douglass, Anthony, and King. “History demonstrates that when the American people get motivated by an issue of justice that they believe is just, extraordinary things can be accomplished,” Koch explains.

“Look at the American revolution, the anti-slavery movement, the women’s suffrage movement, the civil rights movement,” he said. “All of these struck a moral chord with the American people. They all sought to overcome an injustice. And we, too, are seeking to right injustices that are holding our country back.”

Some of this is true! As America’s extraordinary push for same-sex marriage demonstrates, the American people do care deeply about justice. But I’m not convinced the American people are concerned about tipping the scales even more in the favor of wealthy people. I haven’t run a poll or anything, but I don’t think the majority of American households consider fewer regulations and lower corporate taxes to be the definition of “justice.”

However, Koch is 100 percent right about one thing: “If we cannot unite the majority of Americans behind the vision, then we’re done for […] So that, to me, has to be our number one objective.” He correctly understands that he needs the American people on his side to win, and that he can’t just buy his way to victory.

But holy cow is Koch tone deaf about all this. Does he have any understanding of what Martin Luther King actually said? Does he know King was a passionate advocate for income equality? Does he understand that King would very likely be standing against Koch’s drive to disenfranchise the poor through absurd economic policies and shifty attempts to keep people from voting? Does Koch, who has proposed eliminating the minimum wage, know that Martin Luther King Jr. marched in support of a minimum wage increase that would have amounted to $15.27 per hour in today’s money?

In an attempt to educate Koch about the awkwardness of his examples, I’ve illustrated photos of the Koch brothers with actual MLK quotes about income inequality. Good luck finding “justice,” Charles. A great man—maybe you’ve heard of him—once said that the arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends toward justice. Frankly, I’d be curious to see whether Koch could recognize justice if it bit him on his pasty white posterior.

+ Read More

Daily Clips: August 4th, 2015

SEATTLE THIS IS NOT GOOD ENOUGH. VOTE!

Democrats block vote on Planned Parenthood defunding: In our latest national act of partisanship, the Republican controlled Senate put forward a bill that “would have prevented Medicaid reimbursements and federal family planning funds from flowing to Planned Parenthood.” Because that, I guess, is the real problem facing America today. Anyways, sanity prevailed.

But wait! What’s this you say, Huffington Post?

Some Republicans have already threatened to try to shut down the federal government over the issue in the fall. Eighteen House Republicans wrote in a letter to GOP leadership last week that they are “deeply disturbed at recent reports that Planned Parenthood has been selling the tissue of unborn babies for profit” and will not vote for any government funding bill this year that includes money for the provider. 

Feel that rage? So did Elizabeth Warren. If you have six minutes to spare today, please watch her speech in support of Planned Parenthood – it will most likely sum up your frustration in a much more articulate and poignant way:

Rick Santorum and Rick Perry won’t be on the main stage this Thursday: Last election cycle, Santorum and Perry were front and center on the national debate stage. But a lot can change in four years, as now both look to be left out of the primetime Fox News debate. Oops.

The Republican party could see this as a positive sign. Perhaps this recent crop of candidates is now more impressive this time around and that’s why Santorum and Perry have been ousted. But as we all know, that’s hardly the case. Instead, the GOP has replaced actual politicians with entertainers (Trump and Huckabee) – a sign of how much the GOP conflates their politics with the media.

Robots are coming for your (man’s) job: Rejoice women of the world! According to two Oxford researchers, “a close look at the data reveals a surprising pattern: The jobs performed primarily by women are relatively safe, while those typically performed by men are at risk [of being taken over by robots].”

Why is this the case? Because, as the Atlantic notes, “[m]any of the jobs held by men involve perception and manipulation, often in conjunction with physical exertion, such as swinging a hammer or trimming trees. The latest mobile robots combine advanced-sensory systems with dexterous manipulators to successfully perform these sorts of tasks.”